MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — Federal investigators are reviewing a fatal shooting by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer in Minneapolis. The shooting killed a woman during a federal enforcement operation. It also sparked protests and sharp disputes over what happened.
The FBI is leading the investigation. Federal officials say the case involves an on-duty officer. State officials say they want outside oversight. Local leaders say the public deserves clear answers.
The woman who was killed was identified by authorities as Renee Nicole Macklin Good. She was 37. She died Wednesday, Jan. 7, after federal officers approached her SUV in south Minneapolis.
Federal officials have called the shooting self-defense. They say Good used her vehicle in a way that endangered officers. They have not released full video or a detailed timeline. They also have not publicly named the officer who fired.
State and local leaders dispute key parts of the federal account. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey has said witness video does not match the federal version. Gov. Tim Walz has also criticized what he called a lack of transparency. Both have urged a full, independent review.
What authorities say happened
Federal officials say officers were trying to make an arrest. They say the encounter escalated fast. They say the driver moved the vehicle toward officers. They say an officer then fired.
City and state leaders point to a bystander video. They say it raises questions about the threat level. They say the public should not have to rely on fragments online. They want official footage released, if it exists, and in full context.
The FBI has said it is collecting evidence and interviewing witnesses. It has not said when it will release findings. Deadly force cases can take weeks or months to review.
Who investigates — and why it matters
A major conflict is over who gets to investigate. Minnesota’s Bureau of Criminal Apprehension has said it was removed from the case. The agency said it could no longer access evidence after federal authorities took control.
That decision drew criticism. State officials say an independent process builds trust. They say it matters when federal agents use lethal force in a city neighborhood.
Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty has said her office is looking at options. She has said she wants a credible review. She has not announced any charging decision.
Federal agencies have not explained why the state agency was cut off. They have said only that the FBI is the lead investigator.
Officer’s reported identity and June incident
Court records reviewed by media outlets identify the officer as Jonathan Ross. Federal officials have not publicly confirmed the name. They have cited safety concerns for officers and their families.
The same officer named in those records was previously injured in a June 17, 2025, incident in Bloomington, Minnesota, according to prosecutors and court testimony cited by multiple outlets. In that earlier case, an ICE agent was dragged by a vehicle during an attempted arrest.
Vice President JD Vance has said the officer needed 33 stitches from the June incident. He suggested the experience could shape how an officer reacts in a later confrontation. Reuters reported that Vance’s description matched the Bloomington case involving an ICE agent identified as Ross. Reuters also said it could not independently confirm that the same officer fired the fatal shots in Minneapolis.
Those details are now part of the public debate. Some residents say the June incident may explain fear or caution. Others say it should not change the legal standard for deadly force. The FBI has not said whether it is weighing the June event in its review.
A large federal operation in the region
The shooting happened during a major federal immigration enforcement surge in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area. Federal officials have described it as one of the largest operations in the region. Reports have cited about 2,000 officers and agents involved across agencies.
The size of the operation has increased tension. Protesters say the tactics are too aggressive. Federal officials say they are enforcing immigration laws. Minnesota leaders say they want clear limits and stronger oversight.
Protests have been held near federal facilities and near the shooting site. Some gatherings have been peaceful vigils. Other events have included clashes with police. During some confrontations, police have used chemical irritants and crowd-control tools.
City leaders have urged calm. Organizers have urged people to stay peaceful. Many residents have also asked for verified facts before drawing conclusions.
False claims and misidentified images online
The case has also fueled false posts online. Media reports have described misidentified photos of the victim. They also described AI-altered images claiming to identify the officer.
Experts warn that these posts can target the wrong people. They can also inflame tensions. Some posts use old videos or unrelated images as “proof.” Others claim inside information without evidence.
Officials and major news outlets have urged people to rely on confirmed details. They have asked the public to avoid sharing unverified claims.
What comes next
Several questions remain open. Investigators will review whether the officer faced an immediate threat. They will also review whether federal policies were followed. Many agencies discourage shooting at moving vehicles except in narrow cases. The public does not yet know how that policy was applied here.
Investigators will also examine the planning of the operation. They will look at commands given on scene. They will review radio traffic, body-worn cameras, and surveillance footage, if available.
State and local officials say they still want an independent role. Federal officials say the FBI will handle the case. Protesters say they will keep marching until more information is released.
For now, Minneapolis is watching closely. Many residents want answers that are clear and complete. They also want facts that can be trusted.
